Monday, September 19, 2011

Time For Windows XP To Go, says Microsoft COO

Microsoft spent most of this week talking up its new tablet-friendly Windows 8 operating system, but the fact is the majority of enterprises haven't even moved to Windows 7 yet. They may want to get moving, as a senior company official warned that there will be no life extension for Windows XP and related products beyond 2014. "We are end-of-lifing XP and Office 2003 and everything prior, in April 2014," said Kevin Turner, Microsoft's Chief Operating Officer, during a meeting with financial analysts Wednesday. "So for all those companies that have the old products that haven't quite started the refresh, guess what? This has been a great product, XP has been a wonderful product; great TCO has been given. It's now time for it to go." 
Microsoft typically ends support for its operating systems 10 years after their debut. But given that the majority of its business customers were still using the more than a decade-old Windows XP, which debuted in 2001, the company previously decided to extend support to 2014. But Turner left little doubt that XP would not get another reprieve. "We're basically giving it a time of death stamp," he said.

During a keynote at Microsoft's BUILD conference, Windows group president Steven Sinofsky said Tuesday that more than half of all Windows users in the consumer market are now using Windows 7. He didn't provide a figure for the enterprise market, but most analysts believe the majority of businesses continue to use Windows XP. With XP due to expire in two-and-a-half years, they'll soon have to implement a replacement plan. Microsoft is counting on that fact to drive an uptick in sales of new business PCs and, by extension, sales of Windows 7 and its application cousins. "I really like where we're going with the Windows 7, Office 2010, and IE9 refresh," said Turner. Microsoft could use the boost. Overall Windows sales were down 2.4% in the company's most recent fiscal year as many consumers turned to tablets and smartphones for their computing needs.

[As you think about upgrading to Windows 7, learn more about Windows 8 here.]

Some market watchers, however, aren't convinced that Microsoft is going see a significant uptick in Windows 7 sales as XP nears retirement. Sam Khanna, CEO of Technology Project Finance, a Wilton, Conn.-based provider of alternative financing products for IT organizations, believes access to credit could prevent some shops from upgrading. "That aspect of the market is getting better compared to a couple of years ago, but for companies who are below investment grade it could be an issue," said Khanna.

Khanna also believes some enterprises may use XP's end of life as an opportunity to explore non-Microsoft personal computing platforms for employees. "Another reason why we haven't seen mass adoption [of Windows 7] is that people have been experimenting with other things. Some companies are telling employees to bring their own devices to work." Once Microsoft formally retires Windows XP, it will no longer offer support, security updates, or media for the operating system.



Thursday, September 15, 2011

Microsoft Ditches Flash on Metro Version of Internet Explorer 10

Windows 8 will have two versions of Internet Explorer 10 — a desktop version and the Metro version, which is optimized for tablets. Part of that optimization will be a plugin free experience, meaning Metro IE10 will be primarily HTML5 and will not support browser plugins, including Flash.

“The experience that plug-ins provide today is not a good match with Metro style browsing and the modern HTML5 web,” writes Dean Hachamovitch, head of the Internet Explorer team, on Microsoft’s official blog. Microsoft’s reasoning is eerily similar to Steve Jobs’s legendary open letter on Flash from April 2010 in which he wrote, “The mobile era is about low power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards — all areas where Flash falls short.”

Hachamovitch goes on to explain how today’s web is largely HTML5-based and designed for a plugin-free experience. Microsoft recently examined 97,000 web sites, and discovered that 62% of them use Flash, but many of those need it only to display ads. Furthermore, a large number of Flash-using sites fall back to HTML5 if the user’s browser doesn’t support it.

Although the desktop version of IE10 will continue to support all plugins and extensions, this is another defeat for Adobe, whose Flash is slowly losing relevance as the web expands to smartphones and tablets. Interestingly, Silverlight isn’t mentioned in Microsoft’s posts about the plugin-free web.

Friday, August 12, 2011

Create a Recovery Disk for MAC OS X Lion

OS X Lion creates a recovery partition in your system that can be used to restore everything in case of a crash. However, what happens if the recovery partition itself gets corrupted for whatever reason? With Apple's Lion Recovery Disk Assistant, you can make an external recovery disk for the OS as a backup. Download the app from the MAC OS section of http://support.apple.com/downloads. Once installed, plug in a USB drive to your system (at least 1GB free required), launch the LION Recovery Disk Assistant and follow the on-screen instructions. Once the process is complete, the new partition is made. Note that the recovery option can only be used by restarting the machine and selecting the drive in the boot menu that comes up when you keep the 'option' key pressed during boot up. 

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Learning OS X Lion: A dreadful experience for a PC user, but is it worth it?

After spending a little over a week and a half with my shiny, new MacBook Air running OS X Lion, as a Windows user, I must admit… I almost can't take it anymore. Learning OS X is driving me absolutely batty, but not because I think the OS is incapable or anything of that nature. In reality, I had no idea what I was in for and how I would have to learn even the most basic-of-basic functions of the OS.

To be clear, my experience and opinion thus far has absolutely nothing to do with "PC vs. Mac" prattle or me being intentionally provocative; I'm just having difficulty finding the patience to continue dedicating to a $1750 beauty that currently serves for little more than Internet browsing at the moment. And even that has been a pain.

But despite my woes thus far, I am determined to realize the full potential of the Mac way of doing things. I know too many Mac users who I respect and whose opinions I value to just walk away from the OS now, so onward I carry. For anyone thinking of trying OS X after spending most of your years on Windows, prepare to have to deal with some combination of the following frustrations; however, it just might end up being worth it, though the jury's still out on that one for me.

Which freakin' key is it!?

The keyboard. It haunts my dreams. Moving from a PC keyboard to a Mac keyboard has had me pulling what little hair I have left out of my head. Do I press "fn," "control," "option," or "command" before 'c' or 'v' to copy and paste? And where's the delete key? I see one key called "delete," but it's the same as "backspace." Okay, so then, how do I get delete functionality? I guess I have to press a key along with "delete" to achieve that functionality. Hmm, so do I press "fn," "control," "option," or "command" before pressing "delete?"

As a writer, both the backspace and delete keys on PC have become a critical staple to my productivity. Only within the past couple of days have I stopped hitting where the "del" key *would* be on a PC, only to find that, on the MacBook Air, I've hit the power button since it's located where the delete key on my PC is. I swear, I've probably seen the "Are you sure you want to shut down your computer?" dialogue box more than those of you who have used OS X your entire life.

Long story short, there's just no way you can simply jump in and start being Mr. Productivity Writer Guy or Girl with OS X if you've been on Windows your entire life. Likewise, the day will come soon when I put Windows on the Air. I dread the thought of trying to figure out how the keyboard is going to work in that scenario…

From power user to complete newbie

Talk about a shot to the ego, good luck replicating your power user ways from Windows with OS X — in the early stages of learning OS X, at least. This is one I'm still stuck on. What the heck do you do when you try to empty your trash, but a dmg file won't delete because it's supposedly in use? In my case, it was the Adobe flash updater dmg. I made sure everything I had open was closed, but still no dice. What I wanted to do was open a task manager or something of some sort so I could see all running processes and close out anything I felt might be a contributing culprit, but I had absolutely no idea how to go about something like that. Is there even a task manager or anything like that in OS X?

So, I went to restart the machine. And when I did, guess what happened? Everything froze except for my ability to move the pointer around, which was a colorful little spinning circle. I let this go for about 15 minutes before I just did a hard shutdown. Once I rebooted, I could delete the file and all was good. But having no idea of what caused that and no knowledge of if/where there are any system logs to reference is frustrating.

Speaking of that, I now come to the point where I say you have to look up E.V.E.R.Y.T.H.I.N.G! Google this, Google that, and walk away feeling like a moron for no good reason. I'm finding it's difficult to find the answers to certain problems, because they're either such simple "issues" that only a complete newbie would have, or you have to wade through pages-upon-pages of people bickering about "this isn't Windows, you dummy. Everything just works, so it was either something stupid you did or you're a liar." I've even gone to the extent of purchasing one of those expensive "Mac OS X for Beginners" magazine-books, but even it's limited to what it can answer for me at the moment.

Here again, it was shortsighted of me to think I could just pick up OS X and immediately use it in the manner I use Windows.
Antiquated-feeling OS

Perhaps it's just me, but the OS looks extremely antiquated to me in a number of ways. The bar at the top (sorry, I don't know what it's called yet without Googling it — taskbar, topbar, whatever) just looks drab. It's plenty functional, but having to see it and use it for every single program is something I'm going to have to get used to. It's really an eyesore for me at the moment. Not to mention EVERYTHING being shades of gray. It's like only having Windows classic, but worse. I miss Aero Glass something fierce.

Likewise, what's up with the file dialogue windows when you want to save a file and navigate for a place to save? The best way for me to put this in terms that Windows users will understand is to compare this scenario to Microsoft keeping certain elements from Windows 3.1 in their latest version of Windows. Yes, I'm saying that I think OS X needs a significant overhaul of epic proportions in certain ways, but that's just being hypercritical. I'm sure I'll quickly get used to the environment such that I stop nitpicking it to death.

At any rate, the combination of those few things alone has me feeling at times like I'm back in my school library's "Mac lab" in the 7th grade. Needless to say, I'm a bit underwhelmed and confused by all the people who say OS X is "just SO much more beautiful than Windows!" Simplistic, perhaps. But THAT much more beautiful? Meh. I really fail to see what all the fuss is about with OS X's looks out-of-the-box — especially compared to Windows 7.
A really, really expensive venture

Let's face it: when you pay for an Apple product, you're paying astronomically more than you should be for what you're getting under the hood. If the shoe were on the other foot, I could buy an equally-powerful laptop with Windows 7 on it for a quarter of the price I paid for the MacBook Air. So with that said, is the look of this device, its form factor, and its OS really worth THAT much more? If I weren't in a position to safely afford this thing, I'd say absolutely not.

Now, I've seen many justifications for why they cost so much, but I've yet to read a truly compelling reason. Owning this device is kind of like owning an Aston Martin with the guts of the same year's Honda Civic: you'll look good getting to where you're going, but that's about all you've got going for you.

On the next page, I lighten up a bit and discuss the things I like so far about the MacBook Air, as well as conclude the post.



Things I like

So far, the things I like the most are the form factor of the device (it's really, really awesome and has you forgetting all about the astronomical price tag when it's in-hand) and the gestures. I mean, the simplistic, clean look of this device really makes me quite literally smile. Which is dumb, I think, but there's no other way to say it. It's great this device gets that kind of response out of me.

And as for the gestures — I'll just sit there sometimes and run through all the gestures just to watch the animations and transitions. They look very slick and very fluid. Unfortunately, those things are about it so far in terms of things I really like. Oh, no, wait… I almost forgot, it also looks good sitting on my bed with the silver-themed items I have in my room, as seen below:


Now, everything I've said up to this point is not to say that I won't be enjoying this experience far more once I wrangle the basics of this OS, but I feel SEVERELY restricted when working in OS X since I know I'm just one thought or action away from having to look up yet another thing in Google and wade through all the "you're a moron" comments. I'm a productivity nut and learning OS X is slowing me down DRASTICALLY, but I'm going full-immersion here. And I do realize now just how different these two approaches to computing are. As such, I think it's important that I distinguish my experiences here from the perception that I'm just bashing OS X. I honestly do hope that I one day write a post where I admit the journey was an arduous one, but that I have a complete understanding at that point of the sheer benefits of OS X. I just don't see what those benefits are at this particular junction, though.
Conclusion

The marketing of switching just sounds so lovely and quaint, but the reality is a far cry from the idea — or, at least, far from instant. So, one might ask why the heck I'm keeping this thing if I like very little of it so far, and to answer, I'd like to say that this piece originally started off with the following title: "After my first week with OS X, I'm selling my MacBook Air".

Yes, I was going to ditch the thing. But as I mentioned in the opening of this article, it's the prospect of nailing down the Mac way of things and seeing the unity between the keyboard and the OS for myself that has me continuing down this path. Plus, as I also noted, I know too many Mac users who were once die-hard Windows users that switched completely. I absolutely cannot fathom that based on my experiences so far, so based on that intrigue alone, I remain steadfast.

Interestingly, this has made me go back to look at Windows/PC and try to see it from a newbie's perspective — specifically, a newbie coming from OS X. I can't help but feel as though they may feel exactly the same way I do. I mean, if going to OS X is THIS frustrating, then I can envision a similar type of ordeal going to Windows. And if someone felt the way about Windows that I feel after trying OS X, I'd totally understand. Sure, I might be disappointed that they had such a rough go at it, but it's different strokes for different folks.

To close, I have an analogy that I feel best articulates my view of my MacBook Air right now (from a guy's perspective), and that is that it's a bit like dating a high maintenance, drop-dead gorgeous woman: she's thin, attractive, and you love being seen with her, but she drains your wallet from the get-go and all you do is fight and argue with her about small, petty things. But my, oh, my, does she look good and how determined you are to see the good in her, even though things are looking pretty bleak.

Source: www.zdnet.com


Friday, July 22, 2011

Top 10 Tech Products of the Past 40 Years

Products That Set New Standards
Forty years. Thousands of IT products. Many of them made a huge difference for technology professionals, and they're fondly remembered. But only a few truly transformed IT and how IT people, users and businesses did their work. Here are 10 IT products that changed everything.






Dynamic RAM
IBM invented it, but Intel Corp. sold the first commercial DRAM in 1970. Within two years, it was outselling the magnetic core memory that had been the standard since the 1950s. And unlike core memory, DRAM was subject to Moore's Law: Over time, it just got cheaper and more plentiful. Today DRAM compliments processors everywhere - be it in PCs, mobile phones or embedded devices.


Ethernet
Ethernet bubbled up out of Xerox PARC, became a standard in 1980 by way of 802.3 and soon overran proprietary protocols (anyone remember token ring, FDDI or ARCNET?) to become the overwhelmingly dominant networking connection for PCs and servers. Ethernet became the first major standard in connectivity and defined how nodes would communicate with each other, for three decades now.


IBM System/370
In 1964, with its System/360 mainframe, IBM promised that customers wouldn't have to rewrite their software when they bought the next version of the machine. It would be compatible, a revolutionary concept. In 1971, the S/370 kept that promise and sealed the doom of IBM's mainframe competitors. That never-have-to-rewrite compatibility also created the Y2k problem.


IBM Personal Computer
This is a must on anybody's top IT products list. It standardized the desktop computer, made corporates accept it followed by home users too. The PC has spawned several operating systems, most notably Windows and applications to thrive on it - the hegemony that Apple is trying to break. Of course, it has evolved through the years, but the IMB PC 'started it all'.


Apple Macintosh
Macs may not outrun PC sales any time too soon, but what the Mac did do in 1984 is transform users' expectation of how friendly computers should be. The result: mice, graphical interfaces, plug-and-play peripherals and a knockoff from Microsoft called Windows. Monopoly is never good and Mac has kept the PC platform evolving and even playing catch-up many a times.


SAP R/3
Remember when data processing departments built their own financial accounting software? Starting in 1992, SAP AG wiped out the need to maintain all that code, and it was Y2k-compliant, too. It evolved from the mainframe R/2 and could be run on multiple platforms including Microsoft and Unix, opening itself up to a wide user base. R/3 later got renamed to SAP ERP and then ECC.


Salesforce.com
It stands as a glowing example of software as a service and the practicality of cloud computing. If SAP offered buy instead of build, in 1999 Salesforce.com offered rent, quite literally. Founded by former Oracle Marc Benioff, when the company went public in 2004, it used the letters CRM as its stock symbol. Not very imaginative, but drives home the point, doesn't it?


Linux
Since first appearing in 1991, Linux has shown that major pieces of IT infrastructure can be developed by large groups of loosely organized programmers. Sure, it's end user acceptance isn't great, but Linux's forte lies in powering backends of small and large companies alike. The list IT management tools that have grown on this Unix-derived platform is endless.


Netscape Navigator
When Mosaic creator Marc Andreessen added cookies in 1994, Netscape turned the Web into a worldwide marketplace, and it came at a time when the world needed a competitor to the ubiquitous and the seemingly inevitable IE. The last resurrection of this browser was Navigator 9, but more importantly today, Netscape was the base for a another browser that we know today as Firefox.


BlackBerry
There are cell phones and then there's the Blackberry. Starting in 1999 with Research In Motion Ltd's BlackBerry, showed just how business users could use push email, and the era of the 24/7 knowledge worker truly arrived. Blackberry brought in computing without a traditional computer - the carry it anywhere Internet and email device. And yes, you can make calls and do SMS as well.